ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 10:50:39 GMT
If anyone has any feedback for me, I'd be interested to hear...
|
|
p
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by p on Feb 12, 2008 16:03:29 GMT
where is it then ?
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 16:13:49 GMT
|
|
p
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by p on Feb 12, 2008 17:22:08 GMT
I checked that, there's only mezz, unfinished wire and any love on the player
=> deary me, didn notice the scroll bar
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 17:26:02 GMT
Also its been 2nd on the player for some time so it doesn't require scrolling..?
|
|
p
Junior Member
Posts: 68
|
Post by p on Feb 12, 2008 18:07:03 GMT
Well, when I opened the page the player was scrolled down, don't ask me why difficult for me to get my head around the track. I'm not a fan of the original, not even when it was bullet, and I hardly ever listened to it, certainly not the whole 10 minutes so in order to give proper comment, I need to examine the original as well for the first two minutes, I can honestly say your mix improved the track (the original is quite dull to me), I like the short guitar loop, it reminds me of the guitar piece at the end of Group 4 and the little sound effect on the drumpattern (1.15) is short but nice I'll try to get round to the next two minutes asap (not today though) I probably played wire on the player last time I was there => is why it was on top playing
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 18:19:28 GMT
... there a new sub-bass pattern which you wont pick up if you're listening to it on basic computer speakers... I know it doesn't come through on a laptop...
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 18:26:06 GMT
... and a high squeaky percussive layer... I left some of my 100 ideas off of it because I didn't want to spend too long on the thing really...
|
|
|
Post by ghinzu on Feb 12, 2008 19:10:10 GMT
Well, I'm pretty used to the original really.. Unlike P I really like the track... To be honest, I think the additions you made weren't necessary at all, they seem a bit out of place, but that's only me yo
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 19:17:37 GMT
If you like the original then I guess you're gonna feel that way... I reckon if it were an LP5 track, that would be the beginning of the end of the Massive... as would've been the case if Reflection or NOT was the basis for 100th Window... I just don't think the hook-free, non-lyrical, non-musical, sound design exhibit direction is sustainable for a popular multi-million selling band, but thats just my 2p...
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 19:21:05 GMT
... oh and just to say, personally I welcomed Neil saying that they were going to focus on writing songs for this album, in my opinion - hurrah!
|
|
|
Post by briaeos on Feb 12, 2008 20:09:52 GMT
i can't spot that new added stuff (eventhough i'm not listining it through basic computer speakers...maybe compression killed it!?)...
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 20:35:55 GMT
If the boxes have a range of 40-100 or so you should be able to hear a prominent sub bassline over the originals...
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 21:14:02 GMT
Twilight I sort of liked, D and Neil's voices were cool... cause it was MUSICAL yknow... I know the bit on the chorus is a bit weird it sounds a bit like an edit gone wrong, I don't know if people get what I mean by that, but melodies and harmonies I welcome... twilight you can sort of singalong too, even though lyrically its a bit of hazy mumble still... my issue with U.S. wasn't so much with the D vocal, the D vox probably comes across better on that and Twi than on some of the 100th tracks and its always interesting to hear the Del Naja voice go somewhere new... whether it'll come full circle one day and go back to the crack addict-like shouting of the Wild Bunch era, probably sadly not
|
|
ex
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by ex on Feb 12, 2008 21:39:12 GMT
i can't spot that new added stuff (eventhough i'm not listining it through basic computer speakers...maybe compression killed it!?)... the highs rnt maybe so noticeable now that ive listened again, its basically a sound that is the same as the bassline but high... squeak aint really the right word, its noticeable at the end where it just sort of repeats and fades out...
|
|